SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mistermj who wrote (218900)2/16/2007 8:00:40 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
This guy belongs to the same mosque as the Utah shooter. Small world isn't it?

It doesn't mean a lot. The only question is what motive did any particular person have in committing a crime. You can connect the dots all day long and join the likes of the JFK, Marilyn Monroe, 911, etc., conspiracies.

jttmab



To: mistermj who wrote (218900)2/16/2007 8:08:37 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
But Mj NOW you have introduced a second event.

With these two events 'implicating'( we'll say) the same Mosque, that changes things, and suggests that this mosque should possibly be looked at very carefully.

I'm willing to call this a red flag, and I would think the FBI is investigating.

Why didn't you point this second event out at the beginning of the conversation?



To: mistermj who wrote (218900)2/16/2007 8:13:48 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
One cant claim that Utah is 99.9 % non muslim, and then when the 0.1 % visit (what is probably) the same/only Mosque, it naturally leads to an act of terrorism.... just does not make sense....