Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SARMAN who wrote (219446)	2/19/2007 7:52:37 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Why not?

To: SARMAN who wrote (219446)	2/19/2007 8:05:02 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

no one can pull 911 without inside help. No, actually it was brilliant in conception, and yet very low-tech. That's the beauty part of it. All it took was an act of will, access to widely publicized airline schedules, and synchronized watches. We had all become complacent that hijackers would just use their hijacked airplanes for transportation. The Japanese used airplanes as suicide bombs during WWII but we'd forgotten about that, along with the rest of WWII in the Pacific. I suppose you realize that people actually saw the plane fly into the Pentagon. That's the thing that conspiracy theorists have to pretend didn't happen, but people actually did report seeing this on that date. I live in Northern VA, my husband worked half a mile from the Pentagon, so I was paying careful attention to the events of that day as they unfolded. I listened to people talking about it on the radio. Now, you may say they were lying. I can accept your disbelief. But what conspiracy theorists say is that nobody says they saw it, and that's an outright lie.