SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (219900)2/20/2007 11:57:42 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
let a country do what it needs to do - what right does an outsider have to occupy ?



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (219900)2/21/2007 12:10:32 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
your comments brought a few historical thoughts to my mind :

- My dad (not alive anymore) was not a happy person when I became a citizen of New Zealand - his comment was - I fought to get rid of the Queen from India, and you now swear allegiance to the Queen. He was much happier when I told him I had become a US citizen. (didnt tell him I still retain my Kiwi citizenship - he did not need to know the complexities of dual citizenship)

- No doubt the brits provided expertise in many areas to India - railways (India has the biggest rail system in the world now), telegraph etc.

- None of the above negates the life of a person living under occupation by foreign powers. A common sign in those days at restaurants in India was "Dogs and Indians not allowed"



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (219900)2/21/2007 12:38:06 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Mr Gandhi did not invent the concept of Partition and the resultant genocide - he was assasinated for arguing against it.

The Brits decided partition, and then just left - Aug 14/15 1947.

On Aug 15 1947, Mr Nehru was the Prime Minister of India. Mr Gandhi never held any political role.