SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (803)2/21/2007 2:06:02 PM
From: dougSF30  Respond to of 1141
 
I wouldn't call that "obscure", but whatever. Obviously, any attempt at reversal would be contingent upon the degree to which it *is* reversable by our efforts, and the associated costs of doing so vs. not.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (803)2/21/2007 5:08:02 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1141
 
Tenchu,

To "reverse" the effects, you pretty much have to level civilization as we know it.

Or start a wholesale building of nuclear power plants. But saying these 2 things (leveling the civilization as we know it or building thousands of nuclear power plants) is not going to "earn" you an honorary degree in climatology...

To paraphrase Richard Nixon, "we are all climatologists now".

Joe



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (803)2/21/2007 11:24:16 PM
From: Elmer Phud  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1141
 
Tenchu

One problem with the "global warming is our fault" theory is that all the planets of the solar system are getting warmer. It's hard to figure out how Dick Cheney and Halliburton were on Mars causing their polar icecaps to melt by stealing the wealth of third Martian Countries.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News