Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (220203)	2/22/2007 12:36:50 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, Cheney went to the CIA in order to twist arms. Feith's OSP stovepiped information. The reason Cheney's office went after Joe Wilson and the reason you are still slandering him is that Joe Wilson told an INCONVENIENT TRUTH ABOUT IRAQ. If what Joe Wilson said did not harm the Bush administration's plan for war, Cheney's office would have ignored him. Instead, they used the power of the government to try and squash his credibility and damage his family. Their actions speak volumes about the entire situation. They took it seriously which is why Fitzgerald and the CIA took it seriously.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (220203)	2/22/2007 9:42:17 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

Oh, for crying out loud. You want me to dig up refs on the famous British dossier? What a crock that was, based on obviously forged documents and random dubious academic papers, cribbed verbatim without attribution. There's ample evidence that Cheney was running on Mylroie effluent, and there's ample evidence that the dossier was known to be exceedingly suspect from the start. Wilson's trip wasn't exactly necessary to knock that "report from British intelligence" to pieces. I can understand your need to divert attention from the wonderful state W's war has left Iraq in, but this Cheney the victim is pretty bizarre. As for the sneering thing, your need to recycle that one ad nauseum sort of shows your own debating skills are nowhere near what you make them out to be. But then, given your devotion to W the never mistaken war president, also well known "personal responsibility" exemplar, that's not exactly a surprise either.