Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (753)	2/22/2007 12:28:57 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25737

GZ; Trying to turn the Iraq controversy into a liberal vrs conservative battle accomplish nothing, other than to divide America. Editorials such as the link you provided (besides being dated) are increasingly irrelevant as more and more conservatives are abandoning Bush and his philosophy. That Hagel - one of the most staunchest conservative Senators - has shifted positions along with many other very prominent republicans means this is no longer liberal vrs conservative issue. We know where you stand and we know where Ted Kennedy stands, but most Americans are somewhere in the middle of those two positions. I am not anti war - I am anti Iraq. I think Bush screwed up because our efforts should be concentrated in Afghanistan where the terrorists were trained and came from. He took his eye off our enemy as BinLaden still has not been captured and as Afghanistan looks to be especially more troublesome. We are in danger of losing in Afghanistan because of Iraq. The real test for GZ is this. All things being the same, if Clinton had done what Bush did and had created this nightmare - what would your position then be? And THAT is what Roosevelt is referring to in the quote I posted here.