SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (220472)2/23/2007 1:39:34 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
take a simplistic approach like mine - whatever may happen is unlikely to happen in my lifetime, so why spin cycles thinking about it ?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (220472)2/23/2007 1:04:02 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nadine, from your posts, it seems to me that you are elevating islamic terrorism to a existential threat.

At the same time you are dismissing the possibility of global warming as an existential threat.

Since this is the right-wing party line, I'm curious to know if there is anything you disagree with the Right about?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (220472)2/24/2007 1:19:30 AM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nadine, since I believe you to be insane, I'll be kind to you.

I heard Crichton on C-Span where he was very angry, very defensive and much stronger in his views. On Rose he talked about reducing carbon output and he noted that he was for stronger car standards decades ago.

That is about a 70 degree change from where he was on C-Span where he made fun of the googling of terms by those promoting the idea of global warming.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News