SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (826)2/23/2007 6:21:12 AM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 1141
 
I think more recent data is more relevant than going back to Jurasic era, such as recent ice ages:
en.wikipedia.org

There seems to be a 100,000 year pattern, and it seems we have not quite reached the anticipated peek in temperatures of the current cycle. Or maybe it should be called a sub-cycle, if there is a longer term cycle.

So we may be nearing the warmest point in sub-cycle, but in the cold part of longer term cycle...

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News