To: i-node who wrote (3270 ) 2/23/2007 4:27:04 PM From: pcstel Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3386 What I have said, repeatedly, is that XM's GEO along with its repeaters, the system AS DESIGNED, provides better service than SIRI's. LOL!! When you don't know what you are talking about in the first place. It is hard to remember what you said.. Because you you were simply taking baseless opinions and presenting them as FACTS. Maybe this one can jog your memory???To: pcstel who wrote (5392) 10/22/2006 7:40:50 PM From: AliasNotAvailable I don't need a history of the HEO satellites. What I've said, and I'm absolutely correct in saying, is that the satellite infrastructure for Sirius is not doing as good a job as XM's. That's it. That's all I've said. You can BS about it all day long, but it is a known fact. Blame the orbits. Blame the satellites. I don't care. It simply isn't doing the job, as is evidenced by the fact that Sirius is having to lanuch a fourth satellite, this time a GEO, to get the job done. They should have gone with GEO in the first place and they wouldn't have the problem. And of course this statement in the above post where you had to admit that you were too lazy to look up the FACTS. And instead presented your Poor Opinions as FACTS regarding the number of SIRI terrestrial repeaters.. LOL! Okay, they have 130. It doesn't matter. Sure it matters, because it is a clear example of your propensity to just make up stuff that you don't know. It is indicitive of either a very bad Self-Importance Complex.. or you are just lazy. As you can see, these kinds of problems are TYPICAL for Sirius listeners. LOL!! Well at least they get reception most of the day.. Versus XM Ask this ole' boy about XM's "horrible" satellite only reception.xmfan.com