SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (914)2/25/2007 7:22:21 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
I'm with you 100%, to make a candidate's marital history an issue is an act of desperation and completely ridiculous... well, maybe unless the guy was married and divorced 145 times, then it might show a pattern, but let's get serious here, who really gives a damn about how many wives he had.... I think it's it's totally irrelevant as long as he has a plan...

There are plenty of people who never divorced but continue to live their same miserable lives with the same idiotic women instead, I think that should disqualify any candidate...

GZ



To: JDN who wrote (914)2/25/2007 2:23:43 PM
From: jim-thompson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
well i agree with you.... this mess on politics eating our lives for about 2 years by the time it is over next year.... course if you want to count hillary, then it is 3 years.....

i do not have to worry about rudy being president though.... if he is the best the Repub's can do, the democraps have it in the bag....

thought romney might be okay, but it appears that he has too much baggage.....