Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (226876)	2/26/2007 2:30:02 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 275872

Joe, > It seems that you are using a lot of variable that are known today, but were unknown when Opteron came out. One variable is undisputed. Microsoft could have chosen whatever 64-bit standard was best for them. Itanium, AMD-64, Yamhill, whatever. I don't know the details, so we're already heavy into speculation. But I stand by my original point, that Sanders testified under OATH that Microsoft was NOT a monopoly. Why he did that should have been obvious. He was trying to curry favor from Microsoft. It doesn't matter whether he got it or not in the form that he wanted it in, but the attempt was as blatant as his hypocrisy. Tenchusatsu