Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (221633)	2/27/2007 10:29:47 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Yes, might have beens are tough. Like, if we'd continued our sanctions against Iraq instead of invading. But it's hard to imagine it would have been WORSE than the ruinously expensive, bloody, totally fubar cock-up we're in NOW.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (221633)	2/28/2007 2:53:17 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Maybe, maybe not. I've noticed the pattern to lefty logic that says "if only America hadn't interfered, everything would have continued just as it was, so much better." Just like in Tibet. No war. There is a nice train from Beijing to Lhasa now. Chinese people are doing well economically in Tibet, as long as they aren't from Tibet. It's really nice, for everyone other the indigenous people (who are no longer Tibetan, they are now Chinese citizens, lucky them) that can't seem to keep up with the Chinese....