SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Biomaven who wrote (227030)2/28/2007 6:51:31 PM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"Looks to me like you compared 2 cores to 1 core in the SEPCint2006, and 4 cores to 1 core in the FP."

As a customer, I have all rights not to have any clue about how many cores/hyperthreads/hyperlinks/whatever my computer has. If I need to compute something at my department, I simply look at best available machines. I am sure there are multi-core Opterons out there. I would also assume that people tried hard to get better scores on multicore platforms. Apparently they failed, they do not have higher scores, I picked the best, therefore your remark is moot. If you have any better results, please post, I am all ears.

Thanks,

- Ali



To: Biomaven who wrote (227030)2/28/2007 7:36:04 PM
From: justaviewRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Looks to me like you compared 2 cores to 1 core in the SEPCint2006, and 4 cores to 1 core in the FP

You are a one confused dude. cpu2006 int/fp (not rate) is a single-thread benchmark suite. It makes no difference if you are running on a 4, 2 or 1 core system. Only one core is being tested.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News