SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/1/2007 12:23:52 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Respond to of 27181
 
US post-Iraq invasion policies 'incompetent': US diplomat
AFP
Published: Wednesday February 28, 2007

The US policy in Iraq following the 2003 invasion was "incompetent, foolish, dubious," the new US coordinator for Iraq's economic development said Wednesday.

Ambassador Timothy Carney told NPR radio that the US policy to exclude Iraqis from governing the country in the two years following the invasion was "an enormous foolishness" which contributed to the deterioration of security and lengthened the conflict in the country.

"We don't need to go into detail on that, but I think words such as incompetent, foolish, dubious in all of its aspects are the most charitable way to look at that period," he said.

Carney went to Iraq shortly after the March 2003 invasion to manage the country's industry and minerals ministry, but quit after two months and became an outspoken critic of US occupation policy.

"The major failing of policy and operations in 2003 was the failure to invite Iraqis into our councils. We actually thought we could govern this country," he told NPR.

"It was enormously costly in terms of time, and consequently in terms of our and Iraqi blood and the blood of many of our allies."

"What an enormous foolishness that was."



To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/1/2007 12:25:48 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27181
 
"Good morning! How's your day going?

Maybe not so good? Well, at least your day didn't start as badly as Bob Ney's. Our friend Bob -- a/k/a Inmate #28882-016 -- enjoyed the last "morning constitutional" he's going to have in a private commode until September 2009.

Feeling any better?

The Newark Advocate has the text of Ney's farewell e-mail to his pals before "going inside." Seems in addition to putting his house on the market and cashing in his retirement plan to support his family while he's in the hoosegow, Bob's also sold off his shift key.

Tragic.

Well, sorta, anyway:

Previously known as the Kennedy Center, FCI Morgantown is a "minimum security institution," as defined under federal prison criteria. These prisons have dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio and limited or no perimeter fencing, according to information provided by the FCI.

The Morgantown facility is situated in the proximity of both an elementary and a junior high school, and is across the road from a gated trailer park with a fountain.

About 1,300 other inmates are housed at the prison. Among them is "Survivor" winner Richard Hatch.

Former inmates discussing the facility online describe FCI Morgantown as "pretty nice," considering their circumstances.

The dormitories are said to be the size of a gymnasium with rows of bunk beds separated by high, cinder block walls. There are no doors or privacy for the inmates.

There are, however, TV rooms close by that are equipped with bleachers that can seat up to 40 inmates.

Days begin at 6 a.m. with breakfast, then inmates go to the job each is required to have within the facility. Other than to be present for periodic "stand up counts," inmates are largely free to do what they want during the day. There is a library at the facility, as well as exercise opportunities.

At night, after dinner, inmates may go to the prison theater to view a PG-13 movie.

Not bad, for a former co-sponsor (along with Duke Cunningham, by the way) of the "No Frills Prison Act" -- which, incidentally, would have prohibited giving prisoners "food exceeding in quality or quantity that which is available to enlisted personnel in the United States Army."

Now we know where to ship all that rotten and expired garbage Halliburton has been feeding the troops.

How strange, though, that the trailer park across the street is "gated" and Bob's prison is not."



To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/1/2007 1:00:34 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Respond to of 27181
 
"Republican presidential contender John McCain, a staunch backer of the Iraq war but critic of how President Bush has waged it, said U.S. lives had been "wasted" in the four-year-old conflict. Democrats demand the Arizona senator apologize for the comment as Sen. Barack Obama did when the Democratic White House hopeful recently made the same observation.

"Americans are very frustrated, and they have every right to be," McCain said Wednesday on CBS'"Late Show With David Letterman.""We've wasted a lot of our most precious treasure, which is American lives."



To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/6/2007 12:48:45 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Respond to of 27181
 
merry fitzmas



To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/6/2007 10:19:53 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
"According to a new report in Esquire magazine, Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) has suggested that Congress may consider the impeachment of President Bush before his term ends:

“The president says, ‘I don’t care.’ He’s not accountable anymore,” Hagel says, measuring his words by the syllable and his syllables almost by the letter. “He’s not accountable anymore, which isn’t totally true. You can impeach him, and before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment. I don’t know. It depends how this goes.”

The conversation beaches itself for a moment on that word — impeachment — spoken by a conservative Republican from a safe Senate seat in a reddish state. It’s barely even whispered among the serious set in Washington, and it rings like a gong in the middle of the sentence, even though it flowed quite naturally out of the conversation he was having about how everybody had abandoned their responsibility to the country, and now there was a war going bad because of it.

Hagel isn’t the only one frustrated. The desire for more accountability over Bush has led to increasing calls for impeachment from the Washington State legislature, the mayor of Salt Lake City, and town hall meetings in Vermont.

Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) said pushing for impeachment would be counterproductive because it would break off efforts to recruit conservative support for changing the course of the war in Iraq. “We’re trying to get [conservatives] to vote against the war. They’re coming around. You don’t hear them singing the virtues of George Bush like they used to. But nothing will turn this into a partisan lockdown faster than impeachment.” Inslee added, “Ending the war is what’s important now.”



To: PROLIFE who wrote (27073)3/7/2007 2:58:38 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Respond to of 27181
 
' Verdict in Libby perjury trial leaves Cheney exposed
By Sheryl Gay Stolberg
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
<A HREF="http://ad.fr.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v8/350e/3/0/%2a/o%3B20438114%3B0-0%3B0%3B7973099%3B4252-336/280%3B12112136/12130032/1%3B%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com/products/timesselect/iht/overview.html?excamp=ts:iht_more" TARGET="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://m.fr.2mdn.net/518758/backup_iht_336x280.gif" WIDTH="336" HEIGHT="280" ALT="Click here..." BORDER="0"></a>

WASHINGTON: In legal terms, the jury has spoken in the Libby case.

In political terms, Vice President Dick Cheney is still awaiting a judgment.

For many weeks, Washington watched, transfixed, as the trial of I. Lewis Libby Jr. cast Cheney, his former boss, in the role of puppeteer, pulling the strings in a covert public relations campaign to defend the administration's case for war in Iraq and discredit a critic.

"There is a cloud over the vice president," the prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, told the jury in summing up the case last month.

Cheney was not charged in the case, cooperated with the investigation and expressed a willingness to testify if called, though he never was. Yet he was a central figure throughout, aggressively fighting back against suggestions that he and President George W. Bush had taken the country to war on the basis of flawed intelligence, showing himself to be keenly sensitive to how he was portrayed in the press, and backing Libby to the end.

With the jury's verdict Tuesday — finding Libby guilty on four counts, including perjury and obstruction of justice, and not guilty on one count of making false statements to the FBI — Cheney's critics, and even some of his supporters, said the vice president had been diminished.

"The trial has been death by 1,000 cuts for Cheney," said Scott Reed, a Republican strategist. "It's hurt him inside the administration, it's hurt him with the Congress and it's hurt his stature around the world because it has shown a lot of the inner workings of the White House. It peeled the bark right off the way they operate."

The legal question in the case was whether Libby lied to investigators and prosecutors looking into the leak of the name of a CIA operative, Valerie Plame Wilson, whose husband, the former ambassador Joseph Wilson 4th, wrote an Op-Ed article in The New York Times accusing the White House of distorting prewar intelligence. Cheney scrawled notes on a copy of the article, asking, "Did his wife send him on a junket?"

Now Cheney faces a civil suit from Joseph Wilson.

The political question was whether Libby, the vice president's former chief of staff, was "the fall guy" for his boss, in the words of Senator Charles Schumer, Democrat of New York. Though the defense introduced a note from Cheney worrying that Libby was being sacrificed to protect other White House officials, some say the vice president bears responsibility for the fate of his former aide, known as Scooter, whose sentencing is set for June 5.

"It was clear that what Scooter was doing in the Wilson case was at Dick's behest," said Kenneth Adelman, a former Reagan administration official who has been close to both men but has broken with Cheney over the Iraq war. "That was clear. It was clear from Dick's notes on the Op-Ed piece that he wanted to go get Wilson. And Scooter's not that type. He's not a vindictive person."

Cheney is arguably the most powerful vice president in U.S. history, and perhaps the most secretive. The trial painted a portrait of a man deeply immersed in the kind of political pushback that is common to all White Houses, yet often presumed to be the province of low-level political operatives, not the vice president of the United States.

Prosecutors played a tape of Libby testifying to a grand jury that Cheney had asked Bush to selectively declassify an intelligence report so Libby could leak it to sympathetic reporters. Cheney's handwritten scribbles were introduced into evidence at the trial, including one that hinted Cheney believed his own staffer, Libby, was being sacrificed.

"Not going to protect one staffer + sacrifice the guy who was asked to stick his neck in the meat-grinder because of the incompetence of others," the note read.

Cheney's defenders insisted the vice president was not out to smear Wilson or even clear his own name, but simply to defend a policy he fiercely believed in.

"There wasn't some Cheney strategy or Wilson strategy," said Mary Matalin, Cheney's former political director. "There was only one strategy: to convey the nature of the intelligence and the nature of the threat."

Matalin said Cheney remained as influential as ever where it counts — with Bush.

Still, liberal critics of the administration had a field day with the trial. They are hoping the Democrats who now control Congress will use the case to investigate Cheney's role further. Schumer, who was among the first to call for a special prosecutor in the case, suggested in an interview that they might.

"I think there is a view in the public that Libby was the fall guy," Schumer said, "and I do think we will look at how the case shows the misuse of intelligence both before and after the war in Iraq."

Such issues are already of intense interest to scholars.

Historians typically pay scant attention to vice presidents, unless they become president. Cheney, though, is an exception. The historian Robert Dallek, who has written about presidents including Lyndon Johnson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy, predicts that scholars will "be racing for vice presidential records in a way that we've never seen before" to answer questions raised by the Libby trial.

"It will deepen the impressions of someone who was a tremendous manipulator and was very defensive about mistakes, and I think it will greatly deepen the impression of a political operator who knew the ins and outs of Washington hardball politics," Dallek said. "He's going to be, I think, the most interesting vice president in history to study."

On a personal level, friends of the vice president say the trial has been deeply painful for him. Libby and Cheney were all but inseparable, often starting their days by riding to work together.

Libby accompanied the vice president almost everywhere he went, and Cheney made clear his high professional and personal regard for his aide, even hosting a book party for him in 2002 at his official residence.

Alan Simpson, a Republican former senator from Cheney's home state, Wyoming, said he saw Cheney over Christmas, and asked him how he was doing. He took the answer as a kind of oblique reference to the Libby case.

"He said, 'I'm fine, I'm O.K., I have people I trust around me — it's the same old stuff, Al,'" Simpson recalled.

Another friend of Cheney's, Vin Weber, a Republican former congressman, said the verdict has "got to be heartbreaking for the vice president." But he said he wished Cheney would explain himself.

"I don't think he has to do a long apologia, but I think he should say something, just to pierce the boil a little bit."

So far, Cheney has issued a two-paragraph statement saying only that he was disappointed with the verdict, "saddened for Scooter and his family" and would have no further comment while an appeal is pending.