Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (18104)	3/1/2007 11:27:00 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

McCain couldn't let B. Hussein Obama outdo him for long.

To: Webster Groves who wrote (18104)	3/2/2007 7:59:56 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

sure does, and he is wrong for saying it as he was pandering to another bonehead "entertainer".

To: Webster Groves who wrote (18104)	3/2/2007 12:23:18 PM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

He meant shameful waste. When did you guys become fans of nation building? lol, that was a leftie idea I heard you guys saying a few years back. What a mess the president has made of Iraq. YOU must all agree, or is it a smashing success.... All this life that has been lost on all sides, how can that be good?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (18104)	3/3/2007 2:23:28 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

John McCain said a stupid and offensive thing about Iraq the other night, as the Associated Press reports: On Wednesday night, McCain said on CBS' "Late Show With David Letterman": "Americans are very frustrated, and they have every right to be. We've wasted a lot of our most precious treasure, which is American lives." McCain quickly apologized: "I should have used the word, sacrificed, as I have in the past," the Arizona senator said after Democrats demanded he apologize as Sen. Barack Obama did when the White House hopeful recently made the same observation. "No one appreciates and honors more than I do the selfless patriotism of American servicemen and women in the Iraq War," McCain, a former Vietnam prisoner of war, said in a statement. What's odd about this is that waste and sacrifice are opposites. To sacrifice is to give up something of value to oneself for the sake of something more valuable that transcends the self. To waste is to give up something of value for the sake of something of lesser or no value. A sacrifice is an unselfish act; a waste is an act of misdirected selfishness. If a young man goes out, gets drunk, gets behind the wheel of his car, crashes and dies, it is fair to say he has wasted his life. That's quite different from a young man who loses his life in the course of doing dangerous work in the service of his country. Liberal blogger Greg Sargent (http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2007/03/fussillade_of_s.php) complains of a double standard: A number of bloggers today have pointed out that the conservative outrage machine has been silent about this--even as it went into overdrive in response to Obama. But here's another thing to look at. How many stand-alone stories by the big news orgs will we see about McCain's screw-up? How many times do you suppose mainstream media commentators will refer to McCain's fumble as a "mistake," a "gaffe," or any similar such term? But there is a difference. Here is what Obama said: We ended up launching a war that should have never been authorized, and should have never been waged, and to which we now have spent $400 billion, and have seen over 3,000 lives of the bravest young Americans wasted. Here is how he explained it: What I meant to say was those sacrifices have not been honored by the same attention to strategy, diplomacy and honesty on the part of civilian leadership that would give them a clear mission. Obama's initial statement was crystal clear; his "explanation" was a cloud of smoke. Obviously he meant what he said in the first place. He also belongs to a party that has adopted a policy of near-total cynicism when it comes to matters of war, as evidenced by this comment from a colleague of his in today's New York Times: "It's still George Bush's war," said Senator Russell D. Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin, "but we run the risk of gaining some ownership of it if we don't make it absolutely clear that we are the party that wants to get out of there." McCain's choice of words may reflect a reckless streak, and it certainly gives us pause at the thought of his becoming president. But here is the difference: McCain's statement tells us something worrying about his personal character; Obama's tells us something terrifying about his ideological character. opinionjournal.com