SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SARMAN who wrote (222038)3/2/2007 7:39:33 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Mormons are Israelite.

No way. They're Christians. You might be confused by the word Zion used by the LDS.

"Zion is a term with broad significance in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In addition to its Biblical meaning referring to Jerusalem, Mormons see Zion more broadly as any city in which the people are unified and are "pure in heart," with no contention and no poor among them based on living the Law of Consecration. In specific scriptural references, the term refers to the central physical location or city to which Latter-day Saints have historically gathered, which has included Kirtland, Ohio; Independence, Missouri; and Nauvoo, Illinois. In a more metaphorical sense, Zion represents a unified society of Latter-day Saints, unified as members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or with others willing to live the law of consecration. Under this interpretation one can strive to make even one's own home "Zion". Zion also refers to what Latter-day Saints generally believe will be the New Jerusalem, a physical, millennial city expected to be headquartered in Jackson County, Missouri."

That's from Wilkipedia. For some reason the main link is coming up as garbage, the above is from the cached file [google]

jttmab



To: SARMAN who wrote (222038)3/2/2007 7:54:46 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Israel is a nation.
Built on stolen land. What a nation.


Her point is all land is stolen land. There's nothing out of the ordinary with building a nation on stolen land. The USA did it. The main difference (for me) is that the USA lets any human that can contribute join the nation as an immediate equal. The displaced indigenous groups (the Indians) are free to integrate into USA society, and live equally with the rest of us. Also the USA accepts refugees as citizens depending on their need, not their ethnic group. The USA is inclusive of others - we put them on our team and build together.