SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffreyHF who wrote (60706)3/2/2007 6:09:03 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197007
 
JHE - I thought I had read on the thread that NOK claimed not to need Qs IPR.

Still the thrust of my argument is that Q needs the avaialblity of injunctive relief ansd that NOKs strategy is to avoid it. Once NOK avoids injunctive relief then the case goes to trial and that means years during which NOK carries on buiness as usuual.

Best,

L



To: JeffreyHF who wrote (60706)3/3/2007 3:36:11 AM
From: Raglanroadie  Respond to of 197007
 
Considering the HDR investment does anyone know if NOK had a capture period in their license and if so could this relate to the 08 option? Could they be trying to squeeze consideration for their patents knowing some of Q's are under capture up to the expiration of the option?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News