SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: diddlysquatz who wrote (8744)3/3/2007 7:29:04 PM
From: Gib Bogle  Respond to of 30215
 
What do you want, a name?



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (8744)3/3/2007 9:45:29 PM
From: Tommaso  Respond to of 30215
 
"As far as the typical resource investor I firmly believe that they've heard about uranium."

Is that what you meant to say? Well, yes, they have heard about uranium because they have heard about Iran and North Korea and they know that uranium has some purposes. But in the United States, there's almost no coverage at all ( none in the NY Times, for example) of the fact that uranium has risen in price from less than $10 to $85 a pound in about three years.



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (8744)3/3/2007 9:51:25 PM
From: TheSlowLane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30215
 
I think you are right that resource investors have heard about uranium, but I think that there are plenty of resource investors that still do not own any uranium stocks. The big money does not need to hold large portions of their funds in resource stocks, small portions will do just fine.