Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (18146)	3/6/2007 12:38:53 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

You're naive if you think that suppressing American oil usage and simultaneously providing tremendous funding for oil alternatives beginning in 2000 might not have been VERY productive. We STILL use MUCH more oil than China and India COMBINED. Bush is just "starting" to pay "lip service" to alternative fuels and higher fuel standards. Gore would have been on that stuff right out of the gate. Besides that, Gore wouldn't have blown $500,000,000,000 (SO FAR) on this crappy Iraq War and that could have been money spent on things that could have actually HELPED our country.