SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222645)3/6/2007 10:05:17 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
But to say that the Baathists didn't have connections with AQ, and weren't home-rolling as many terrorists as they could manage, is equally unsupported by the evidence.

To say the Baathists had any useful connections with AQ is also unsupported by the evidence.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222645)3/6/2007 10:21:10 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 281500
 
"But to say that the Baathists didn't have connections with AQ, and weren't home-rolling as many terrorists as they could manage, is equally unsupported by the evidence."

Terrorists for WHO? See Nadine, most of us don't think we should have invaded if Saddam supported terrorists in ISRAEL.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News