Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222698)	3/6/2007 12:24:19 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 281500

"What a horrible precedent...any prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich for perjury based on differing memories." It's nice that you know more than the 11 Americans who sat through the entire trial, heard all the evidence and deliberated for days. Ed

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222698)	3/6/2007 12:59:07 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine you liar. Plame WAS a NOC which is how this entire sorry affair got into gear. It's because she was covert that the CIA complained and got the ball rolling. Your knowledge of reality is nonexistent and your idiotic propaganda is old and discredited. Libby could have told the truth, quit the admin and run for cover. Instead, he's going to jail and for what? The Bushies tried to silence the truth, tried to silence free speech and for what? They did it for money. It's pathetic.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222698)	3/6/2007 5:57:51 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

>>" What a horrible precedent. "<< Ohmigosh...what next?...Impeach a sitting president for having sex and lying about it??

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222698)	3/6/2007 9:43:37 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You forgot about the CIA conspiracy angle in all this. Cheney just had to start the smear campaign because the CIA was conspiring against him. Poor Scooter was collateral damage, he had to take a bullet for Shooter.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222698)	3/7/2007 2:25:17 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

What a horrible precedent...any prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich for perjury based on differing memories. Would you please stop making this stuff up! No prosecutor has ever indicted a ham sandwich for perjury, and won!