SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (222747)3/6/2007 4:00:40 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 281500
 
It's PLAME, not Plume.
PLAME.



To: Suma who wrote (222747)3/6/2007 8:03:32 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Armitage leaked Plame, and has not been charged. Because he committed no crime. You think Fitzgerald wouldn't have prosecuted for the leak if he could have found a crime?



To: Suma who wrote (222747)3/7/2007 2:34:26 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 281500
 
I seem to recall that President Bush said that whomever had exposed Valerie Plume will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law...


I think he said that the would be "persecuted".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News