Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (55602)	3/8/2007 8:51:30 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

You may want to read Oeconomicus post from the WaPo. IMO, once the Justice Dept. learned the so-called "leak" came from Armitage, who opposed the war & was clearly no insider at the WH, the investigation should have folded like a lawn chair. I read something that by the time Fitzgerald came on the scene that Libby had already already purgered himself to the FBI. Based on this crime in front of him, even when it quickly became clear that there was no crime in the leak it would have been negligent to ignore the evidence pointing to a purgery crime by Libby. That sounds familiar? I should have linked the article - it tries to debunk the "once it was obvious there was no leak crime the whole thing should have ended" claim.