SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (7640)3/8/2007 12:09:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
"The people who are getting the carry trade spread are being subsidized by Japanese consumers," Greenspan added.

In a sense.. yes. But those people who participate in that very carry trade subsidize the Japanese economy and prevent it from falling into recession/depression (for the time being). How many Japanese jobs (the depositors) would be lost should the Yen rise to levels where it's products were no longer cost competive? So Japan needs those savers as a source of inexpensive capital to restore their fragile economy, but too much of a good thing has its consequences. And that is where the carry-trade comes into for the purpose of siphoning off excess deposits and lending them to other foreign investors who use the funds for higher rates of return.

Because without the carry trade, interest rates would fall completely to zero, the Yen would go through the roof in value, and Japan's monetary base would drastically shrink as all of those loans were paid off, leaving nothing to pay the depositor. And the economic contraction created by FORCING those carry trades to unwind over a short period of time might creat a global economic depression from the contagion effect.

Japan has some major issues to face economically. They have one of the highest national debts versus GDP of any nation, primarily due to their incremental economic "pump priming", as opposed to economic shock treatment that fosters consumer demand. And even that economic shock treatment might not work considering that 1/4 of Japan's population is entering retirement (and are consequently the greatest depositors).

I can't say that I know the answer for Japan's economic problems, or how to spur internal economic demand, but forcing a "short squeeze" in the Yen carry trade is certainly going to evoke a major response by the Japanese CB and government to flood liquidity into the market place, if only to preserve their economic recovery. But this infusion of liquidity will mean nothing unless it spurs internal consumer demand to the point where they spend, rather than put their money into the financial equivalent of a "mattress".

It certainly will require the Japanese government to do more than create "make work" projects via it's deficit spending. This time the Japanese people will have to be convinced to fund internal economic projects that will provide them a higher yielding rate of return than near 0% deposits.

So.. Greenspan is correct about Japanese consumers subsidizing the carry trade. But it works the other way around. Maybe one of the things that might assist Japan is to motivate Japanese savers to invest for THEMSELVES in other high-yielding foreign financial instruments (rather than the Bank of Japan, or Postal Savings Bank acting as the middle man). Invest in foreign debt directly, rather than domestic savings accounts. It's long overdue, but there is a definite cultural risk aversion to investing in anything other than Japanese debt and stocks. But something has to "sop up" those excess deposits in Japanese banks.

So it's a subsidization of the carry-trade that is entirely driven by the risk-averse nature of Japanese savers/investors.

And it's apparently quite voluntary on the part of the Japanese consumer/saver.

Hawk



To: John Pitera who wrote (7640)3/8/2007 4:53:56 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
Cashin On YEN-- Gartman on Global Equity Bear----

Art Cashin is commenting that it is the YEN that is moving the US Stockmarket.

There Was Data. There Was News. There Was Fedspeak. But The Markets Cared
Only About The Yen – The pundits will try to tell you that the Fed’s Tan Book caused this
or that.

Others will point to other data bits or comments by Fed speakers. Nice try – but wrong.
Wednesday’s stock trading can be summed up very simply. When the Japanese yen weakened to where it took more than 116.5 yen to get a dollar, stocks rallied. Late in the day
when the yen rallied to the point where it only took 116.0 yen to buy a dollar, stocks shrank back and closed down on the day. That’s the whole story but that won’t fill up six hours of TV coverage so you heard lots of other (wrong) theories.

Cashin’s Comments March 8, 2007
Page 2 of 3

It’s The Yen Again – As dawn breaks in New York, Asian markets have rallied and U.S. futures are strong. Why? The yen has sold off significantly. This morning you need 117.15 yen to get one dollar. The “carry traders” feel much less threatened.

An Icon Touches The Third Rail Or Maybe Just A Deep Collective Anxiety – We had the pleasure of entertaining our friend, Dennis Gartman on the Floor of the NYSE Wednesday morning. Dennis is always a celebrity in any trading community but yesterday he was surrounded like a rock star.
We missed his appearance on Dylan Rattigan’s show, “Fast Money”, on CNBC Tuesday night. By the attention Dennis drew on the Floor, I may have been the only one who missed it. Even some of the CNBC executives, who were at the NYSE to ring the opening bell for a promotion, came over to Dennis.

They said his appearance and specifically his comments had produced an avalanche of emails.
Dennis had apparently stunned his fellow panelists (and a chunk of the audience) by stating that he thought markets were signaling a global bear market which would be revealed after a couple of weeks of choppy volatility. He also suggested that a combination of “corn and crude” would outperform a basket of “brokerage and banking” stocks over the next six months. When Dennis talks, you don’t need a translator.

The crowds who came to talk to him ate up most of his time so we didn’t get to chat much. We hope to make up for that when he and Margaret return in April.

My Bartender, The Philosopher, Says Be Careful What You Wish For – Or – Why Having Access To The World In A Device
On Your Hip May Not Be Ideal – I have a bartender who is a philosopher. Now, I suppose you think all bartenders are
philosophers but they are not. All bartenders are certainly psychologists but only a few are philosophers - and this one has a degree in philosophy. By convenient coincidence, this philosopher/bartender is named Saporito. Now, if you’ve had about four years of Latin, you know that “Sap” is the root base for “wisdom”. “Verbum sat sapiente” is “a word to the wise is sufficient”. “Verbum” being word. “Sat” being enough (as in satisfied) and “sapiente” being wise (as the object of a preposition). Our species is designated “Homo Sapiens” or Thinking Man.

At any rate, it is a slow evening at this establishment close to the Exchange. It is not teeming with traders as normal. So philosopher Saporito and I get to chat. This evening, perhaps inspired by Dennis visiting the NYSE, I am recounting the discussion I had with John Mauldin and Dennis and Margaret Gartman the last time they were all in New York. If you don’t recall, it was all about the accelerating changes in technology that are giving us cell phones that take pictures, play music, connect to a computer and bring us the events around the globe instantaneously. I recount that this prior discussion pondered whether we would soon have the fabled Library of Alexandria on our hip with instant access to all human knowledge.

My philosopher/bartender wrinkles her nose and says – “Be careful. Remember Phaedrus.” Now even if I had not consumed three bowls of ice cubes (with sauce), I might have taken a minute or two. Phaedrus was Plato’s retelling of the meeting of his teacher, Socrates, with the latter’s friend, Phaedrus. Sensing that I was sorting through my Phaedrus file for the connection to the topic, the
philosopher takes me off the hook by saying “Toth and Thamus.” Suddenly, the light bulb goes off.

As you probably recall (faster than I did), Toth was one of the higher deities of the early Egyptians. He was very creative and was said to have developed things like mathematics, geometry and writing. He offered them all to mankind by offering them to King Thamus, King of the Egyptians. Thamus thought many of the things useful and good but had reservations about “writing”.
Toth, the god, thought writing would make knowledge permanent, something that could be passed accurately, maybe immutably, through centuries and maybe a millennia. How could that not be good? Thamus, the king, had grave reservations. Writing would mean that students need not listen carefully to their teachers. They would not need to use their memories. They could always just look it up. Without the teacher/student conversational challenge and
response, would learning – true learning – suffer? Would people fail to question and evaluate as true learning requires?

That, I realized, was why my friend and philosopher/bartender reached back to Phaedrus. If we have all the presumed current
knowledge instantaneously on our hip, we all become passively acceptant and unquestioning. Would we all get an instant,
homogenized, predigested view of news, events, and data? Would that, in turn, freeze, or at least slow, man’s search for truth and maybe stagnate the growth of knowledge. Maybe those questions are not applicable to the evolving devices on our hips. But questioning is the basis of knowledge and – as the Socratic Method suggests – philosophy. Maybe that’s what my friend the bartender was aiming at.

Overnight – The key event is the aforementioned drop in the Japanese yen. That has encouraged bids in stocks and various
commodities. Even Alan Greenspan has begun talking about the “carry trade”. In a speech he suggested the carry trade was still going strong but cautioned that…“at some point it’s got to turn”.

Cashin’s Comments March 8, 2007
Page 3 of 3

Today – The President is out of the country. Pre-opening we’ll hear from the Bank of England and the European Central Bank. We’ll also see the Initial Claims data. At 10:30 comes Natural Gas inventories. Consensus – The fall in the yen should give the bulls a chance to regroup and shore up their defenses.



To: John Pitera who wrote (7640)3/8/2007 4:55:02 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 33421
 
Federal Reserve website says M1 (money supply) shrinking for latest 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks.

(Make sure to go far enough down this page :

federalreserve.gov

to see the section that has the periods ending February 26, 2007).

Yes, M2 is still growing.

Anyone want to discuss if shrinking M1 actually means anything (?)

Jon.