Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (223046)	3/8/2007 11:26:58 AM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Mjfdl, re: At least one of the jurors now supports a pardon of Libby. So what. What does it matter? I've never expressed any opinion regarding that issue. I saw the interview and the lady was bright, articulate, fair minded and very, very clear on the fact that Libby lied under oath. The issue of a pardon is up to his buddy, W. And I suspect we all have a pretty good idea how that will work out. Do you think a pardon for one of the president's men who lied under oath multiple times might set some kind of precedent? Do you think that future president Obama or H. Clinton's aides should be made to feel secure knowing that they could lie to Grand Juries under oath and never have to spend a day in jail? Would that make them heroes? Try to see the big picture. Ed