SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Crazy Fools LightHouse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (2209)3/8/2007 7:58:20 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3198
 
A fairy tale world

February 28, 2007.
By Hugo Salinas Price

The World is exchanging goods and services by various national means of exchange. We are using those same means of exchange as a vehicle for savings. We are denominating credit contracts in any one of various national means of exchange. The predominant means of exchange is the US dollar.

However, a means of exchange voluntarily accepted as such, by those who participate in exchanging goods and services, by those who use it as a vehicle for savings and by those who denominate credit contracts in it, is not per se money.

Money must, sine qua non, function not only as a means of exchange, but also as a means of payment.

The world, as of February 2007, does not possess a means of payment. In economic terms, payment is the exchange of something for something. In today’s world, when units of what is called money are tendered in payment of a purchase, or in settlement of a balance after an exchange, or in settlement of debt, there has been in reality and economically no such payment. We are in these cases using the term “payment” merely as a legal convention and a leftover from a previous era, when payment did in fact exist and govern all economic activities.

Money, properly speaking, must be definable! The dollar cannot be defined: so said Alan Greenspan himself, the Pope of Central Bankers, in reference to the dollar, which is the reserve currency of the world and which “backs” all other currencies. When something is not definable, it has no physical existence. A thing that has no physical existence is imaginary. An imaginary thing such as money is today, is as different from real, actual money, as an imaginary loaf of bread is different from a loaf of bread in one’s hand.

A money payment must involve a tendering of tangible money, gold or silver, or of a credit instrument which is recognized as entitling the owner to the undoubted right to immediate redemption of that instrument, in gold or silver.

Humanity is unaware of the stupendously important fact that it lives in a world without money. This lack of awareness is perhaps the most singular feature of our contemporary world, upon which historians – if the world does survive this episode and produce historians at some future date – will remark with amazement: “How was it possible that billions of humans could delude themselves into acting as if what they used for payments, credit contracts and savings, was actually money?”

About 1997 I began to look for data concerning the amount of “reserves”, excluding gold, held by the world’s Central Banks. In other words, the amount of imaginary money they were holding, otherwise called “paper money”. In 1997, those “reserves” totaled $1,300,000,000,000 ($1.3 Trillion) dollars. Not all those “reserves” are dollars, but most of them are.

Back then, not many people were paying attention to that datum. Since then, it has received increasing attention, which is not surprising, for the “reserves” are piling up and showing numbers that are clearly “going ballistic”. As of January 2007, world Central Bank “reserves” were hitting $5 trillion dollars, an increase of 385% in ten years. The last increase of $1 Trillion only took five months, from August 2006 to January 2007. (“Bloomberg”)

Before 1971, Central Bank reserves were mainly gold, plus component of foreign exchange redeemable in gold. Reserves could only grow very slowly. Imbalances in trade were shunned because the settlement of deficits had to be made in gold or dollars exchangeable for gold. International trade was stable. Imports could not affect the economies of importing countries as much as they do today, with “globalization”. Therefore, local productive activities were stable. Jobs were generated through reinvestment in productive activities.

The present situation is chaotic, because the creation of reserves of fictitious, imaginary “money” originates mainly in Dollars which are spewed forth by the out-of-control US economy, plus other fictitious moneys like the Euro born in the European Union, the Yen born in Japan, the Pound born in the UK, all of which are held by other countries as “reserves”.

Since today “money” is imaginary, fictitious, imports no longer have any limit, for it actually costs nothing to “pay” when “money” is imaginary. Thus, “globalization” based on the unlimited creation of fictitious money is a totally false globalization unsupported by economic facts.

The more important Central Banks are becoming skittish about the enormous amounts of “reserves” which they are accumulating. The Central Bankers are bureaucrats, but they are sensing that these enormous holdings are rather worrisome; however they do not know what to do about them. The fact is, they have been had. Their “reserves” are simply numerical and lack any substance. They are imaginary and as useless as castles in the air, unless they can manage to get rid of them by passing them on to some unsuspecting seller of tangible goods.

China is now going around the world – especially Africa – looking for opportunities to buy raw materials (a Chinese delegation will be present at the First International Mining Forum in Mexico, the middle of March). For the same reason, the Central Banks that subscribed the Washington Agreement (to sell no more than a certain amount of gold each year) have since 2006 lost their former appetite for gold sales and they are not covering their allotted sales quotas. It appears that they have finally realized that the reserves that are actually worth something are the gold reserves, and not the “foreign currency” bond holdings which they were so eager to hold because they “provided earnings”.

However, if they start to unload their imaginary holdings, the exchange value of the holdings will begin to fall. So they are in a dilemma, a choice between two distasteful alternatives: “Shall we hold on to the imaginary money and wait and see what happens, or shall we begin to unload it and risk collapsing the value of the larger part remaining with us?”

Up till now, the Central Bankers have been doing what bureaucrats usually do when they are faced with a difficult choice: nothing. They are waiting to see what happens.

More than half of the world’s Central Bank “reserves” are held by the Central Banks of China, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia. These Central Banks ended up with these huge “reserves” because they accepted a means of exchange - which was no more than imaginary money, digits on computer discs - as if it was payment. In other words, they believed a fairy tale, like the one where Jack trades his cow for a handful of colored beans.

So, we are living in a fairy tale world, where money is not money at all. Alas, reality cannot be fooled by means of fairy tales. How we shall fare, when the dream has vanished into thin air and the last fool has had to recognize the difference between a payment and a fairy tale?

plata.com.mx



To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (2209)3/9/2007 5:36:47 PM
From: ms.smartest.person  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3198
 
&#8362 David Pescod's Late Edition March 9, 2007

BLUE NOTE MINING (V-BN) $0.47 n/c

One stock that has surprised us in that it hasn’t done any better than it has recently is Blue Note Mining. Unlike the thousands of other junior mines out there that are still looking for something or the few that may have something that will be a producer three or five years down the road, Blue Note will be a producing zinc/lead mine in New Brunswick within 3-4 months. And the cash flow could be huge.

A little history on this project and their Caribou and Restigouche zinc/lead mine, is that this is a former producer back in 1997 and 1998 when Breakwater owned them. In an irony of the times, it was closed because of low zinc prices. Unless you’ve spent the last 10 years in some sort of Tibetan monastery, you know that suddenly, one of the stories of the day is commodity prices and/or the shortage of commodities to feed the hungry beasts of India and China.

While zinc prices are currently in a bit of a conspiracy debate about what Chinese zinc smelters, big users of the metal, are trying to accomplish, the one thing that is apparent is the shortage of zinc in inventory, particularly in London. Zinc prices look like they are set for some time and there are certainly not a lot of zinc mines coming on stream over the next few years.

The Caribou and Restigouche project currently has about 5 million tons grading 6.6% zinc and 3.4% lead, but also has some small copper and silver credits. When production starts in June/July, their target for this year is 68 million pounds of zinc and 35 million pounds of lead, plus smaller credits of other minerals. Next year, their full year of production, the hope is for 100 million pounds of zinc and 57 million pounds of lead. This will be a significant money spinner given current prices.

The company has made their calculations for cash flow and profit numbers down the road based on zinc at $1.44 and lead at $0.52.

While zinc has been bouncing between $1.45 and $1.55 lately (meaning their number is relatively aggressive) for lead, currently trading at $0.82, there is obviously a significant safety margin there.

One thing that could be significant for the company is the $800,000 they are going to be spending over the next while on a drilling program as they hope to increase their reserves from a five year mine life to nine years and that will be significant.

There are very few analysts following this story, so to get good information is relatively hard, but we have to take our hat off to Hendrik Visagie the Octagon mining analyst who has written up a good report (19 pages) for your reading enjoyment that takes a good look at this project and comes up with some pretty intriguing cash flow numbers.

He gives the stock a target of $1.00 and once again, this will be a producer within 3-4 months.

One thing to be aware of is this stock price, despite the $0.47 you might see is not as cheap as it looks. The company has about 312 million shares outstanding fully diluted and there are some convertible debentures that Breakwater the former owner has outstanding (Breakwater has a few of its own problems these days, hence why they probably decided not to go ahead with these projects themselves) so the market cap is a little bigger than you might have thought at first, but still even at $1.00 a share (which to our way of thinking is a very realistic target) that’s still not that big a market cap.

For background on the company, contact Blue Note at www.bluenotemining.ca for some articles and the Octagon report.

GOLD: (April Contract) $649.50 -6.00

I’m sure the thoughtful speculator/investor from time to time might worry about all these hundreds or thousands of junior resource companies announcing a discovery of ten metres of whatever gold, or this significant intersect, but maybe there are so many companies out there the world is going to be flooded with gold. Not the case, folks.

There are very few properties out of a thousand that will ever become a mine and it’s not because of not finding a commercial ore body. Maybe they found it in the wrong country, such as Crystallex (KRY) in Venezuela, or maybe they found it underneath a town and the town doesn’t want to be moved.

When you do think of gold though, the one area of the world that’s a big producer that you instinctively think of is South Africa. Like many areas of the world, much of today’s gold still comes from mines that were discovered decades ago, that have been producing for ages, their ore bodies are getting deeper, more expensive to mine and in many cases the grades are less and less.

For those worried about the world being flooded with gold, Credit Suisse has a report out showing that South Africa’s 2006 gold output slid 7% to an 84-year low. More interesting though, is that their fourth quarter results for 2006 suggested that production fell by as much as 9.3%. No, there’s no flood of gold in the foreseeable future.

PETROLIFERA PETROLEUM (T-PDP) $16.86 +0.07

Connacher Oil & Gas (CLL) is one of our favorite stories for the next six to eight months as they get ever closer to production for their Great Divide project. But another story a person has to watch is Petrolifera Petroleum because Connacher is a significant shareholder and any success Petrolifera has, Connacher shares it.

We touch base with Dick Gusella, who is busy these days running both companies and he brings us up-to-date. Petrolifera he tells us “is drilling ahead at its 1016 location on the Puesto Morales/Rinconada block in Argentina.” He tells us that “this is the first of what could be a 50-well program in Argentina during 2007 using as many as three rigs by midyear.”

He suggests that they will also be “focused on completing the company’s facilities and on securing new acreage. It is hoped new land awards and concessions will be acquired in the next 30 days or so.”

“The company reported its year end reserves last week per a GLJ study and will be proceeding with a pressure maintenance scheme using waterflood at Puesto Morales over the next several months and this should provide continued pressure support for its current production growth of both oil and gas to come from current drilling, should it be successful.”

If you would like to receive the Late Edition, email Debbie at debbie_lewis@canaccord.com