Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223324)	3/9/2007 5:32:17 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, you continue to spout evil war mongering and lies. What is wrong with you? Do you not have a single moral or ethical bone left in your body? The Wilsons are patriotic whereas you refuse to actually go and live in Israel. Why is that again? Why do you refuse to live in Israel the land that you love? What a curious lack of patriotism you have Nadine.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223324)	3/9/2007 7:08:31 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But you still haven't explained what, exactly, was a lie in "Wilson's lying NYT op-ed". I'm not exactly holding my breath on that one.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223324)	3/9/2007 9:37:08 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

Hey Dini girl, I forgot about this part: Like c2 says, any lawyer worth his salt will just love to cross-examine Joe Wilson about his track record of lies. Which is why the civil case will never come to trial. Carrie boy is about as full of W's flavor of BS as you are, but it's a bit ironic to postulate Wilson's alleged fear of cross examination given Scooter's and Shooter's testimony at Scooter's trial. I'd say that's somewhat stronger evidence of fear of cross examination than some W flack's conjecture about Wilson. But then, it'd be hard to match Shooter's track record of lies. And Scooter's sort of been convicted on that front, but of course, in true W "personal responsibility" fashion, it's all somebody else's fault.