Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (35471)	3/9/2007 4:12:55 PM
From: tyc:>	Respond to of 78430

Thanks for the replies. I can see the advantages of allowing the junior to take the risk, especially knowledgeable juniors. But my problem as a speculator is to decide which is better, where they are doing the work on land belonging to a junior to earn a 75% interest, or where the junior is allowed to do the work, subject to a 75% buy-in. lol Schaft Creek is indeed a good project. I'm surprised that Teck didn't choose to do it themselves, but I can see the benifits. Now, which to choose ?