Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (198723)	3/9/2007 4:07:58 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793881

I understand the need around the household for explosives, but why in the normal course of your life would one really need armour piercing bullets? I haven't been hunting in a few years, but who exactly uses armour piercing bullets, I mean for goose or bear aren't they a tad over the top. OTOH they are being approved for Washington DC, perhaps every politician should sign a waiver that they understand that in Washington DC there is a need for Armour Piercing bullets and explosives, and that he will not hold the government Responsible for injuries caused during pigeon hunting season.

To: Wayners who wrote (198723)	3/9/2007 4:19:57 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793881

Gun laws are only hurting HONEST citizens. Does anyone think a CRIMINAL gives a damn about gun control? jdn

To: Wayners who wrote (198723)	3/9/2007 5:49:35 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793881

"Judge Karen Henderson dissented, saying that because the District of Columbia isn't a state, the Second Amendment doesn't apply to it." So does that mean since DC isn't a state, that the Constitution doesn't apply to it? Do we actually pay for these morons?