Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (328390)	3/9/2007 11:50:38 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576311

Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. That's exactly what we don't know. Just wonder what caused the previous GWs, because we do know now that they were not preceded by CO2 increases, right? Because we now know that the CO2 tracked the previous GWs by hundreds of years, that the CO2 increases back then were most likely even caused by increases in the world temperatures predating the CO2 increases by hundreds of years. And not the other way around. Something is rotten in the theory state of global warming. Taro