Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (223612)	3/11/2007 8:37:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

. No, and don't pay no attention to any protests from CIA people that their caveats and warnings were systematically ignored by people who wanted to believe one line and dismissed anything that contradicted that line I have heard the CIA. But they left their evidence behind from before 2003, and it doesn't contain very many warings at all. Look at it this way. Someone has too pay for such a massive failure of intelligence. It's either going to be the CIA - the natural party - or the Bush administration. Remember that, and I think we can evaluate where every party is coming from in their declarations. The left has this tendency to suddenly believe that anybody critical of the Bush administration is a noble truth teller without any impure agenda. In fact, as long as you criticize Bush you can be caught out in multiple lies (like Joe Wilson) or even be caught taking bribes from Saddam Hussein (like Scott Ritter) and it won't hurt your credibility a bit.