Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (223640)	3/12/2007 1:37:04 AM
From: Sultan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Message 23359852

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (223640)	3/12/2007 1:49:27 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

From the list of Saddam's Oil for Food Vouchers, as published in Iraq in 2004: U.S.A. 1. Shaker Al-Khaffaji 7 million 2. Samir Vincent 10.5 million Shaker Al-Khaffaji (7 million barrels) advanced $400,000 to Scott Ritter, former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq. Ritter produced a documentary purporting to tell the true story of the weapons inspections, which in his telling were corrupted by sinister U.S. manipulation. [47] memri.org So, money flows from Saddam to Shaker Al Khaffaji to Scott Ritter. And by the most amazing coincidence, Scott Ritter's story about Saddams weapons changes from warning that he was still dangerous in 1999 to saying he had no WMDS in 2002. Now during the time in question there were no weapons inspections going on at all, so what happened to change Ritter's mind? Something had to change, right? What is there besides the money? Of course you won't answer because "I lost the debate". I think you are confusing "shouting down" with "debate".