Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223664)	3/12/2007 7:53:14 AM
From: Sam	Respond to of 281500

Duelfer was far more in the pocket of Bush loyalists than Ritter was in the pocket of Saddam, as you keep alleging (and is nonsense, but nevermind). Duelfer's job was to try to clean up the problems that David Kay caused for the Loyalists when he contradicted their storyline. he basically did this by providing the kind of cover that you cite in your post. You dismiss Ritter as a legitimate source; I dismiss Duelfer. Whatever Salman Pak was, they could have been destroyed by either the Kurds or the US/British flybys without the invasion of Iraq. And round and round and round we go, where we stop....