Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stephen O who wrote (11587)	3/12/2007 1:16:48 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37056

IPCC report was worked on by over 600 scientists. It went through peer review process that attracted over 30,000 comments. You say the report is not valid because one of them disagreed with it? Let's see 600+ vs. 1 detractor who may be one of those who took up the $10,000 offer from Exxon-Mobile to detract from the report. You didn't mention what his/her objection to the report was. Apparantly there were many that felt the report was far to cautious/conservative and sugar-coated the consequences of not acting on Global warming.