Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (328615)	3/12/2007 4:25:15 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574636

I'm not just guessing. I don't have the exact numbers for overseas sales of American weapons, but I know they are significantly less than weapon sales from American companies to the US military. The difference is enough that when you combine the drop in % of GDP for the military over the course of, and since the end of, the cold war, there isn't anyway that the military industrial complex can be bigger in % of GDP terms. Its also very unlikely that its bigger in terms of people employed. Manufacturing in the US produces more value with a lot less people than it used to, defense is not immune to this. If you really want to maintain that the "military industrial complex" employs a larger percentage of Americans than during the cold war or WWII, I don't have hard data (except for WWII) to prove you wrong, but its extremely unlikely. If you include the soldiers in the military as part of the military industrial complex (and I think you should) then we definitely employee less people than in the past, as our military is much smaller in number terms. Since we are currently fighting a war you should compare to other wars (WWII, Korea, Vietnam), but even if you compare to the period between Korean and Vietnam , the military, and the "military industrial complex" is smaller as a portion of the US (% of people employed,% of hours worked, % of GDP, % of government spending etc.) If you just want to compare the end of Clinton's administration to today then yes the "military industrial complex" has grown, but its still a smaller part of the country than it was under Reagan, much smaller than Vietnam or Korea, and incredibly smaller than during WWII. -- in a certain sense there is no "between Korea and Vietnam, as preliminary involvement in Vietnam started before Korea ended, but most people wouldn't consider such a low level of involvement to be part of the Vietnam War