Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (11593)	3/13/2007 2:37:33 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 37031

Where is the evidence the balance of the scientific community DOES support the idea that Global Warming is happening AND it is Man-Made. I tried searching and one can find opposing but not supporting. Of course wikipedia.org is a pollution generator paid for by pollution generators. LOL...... en.wikipedia.org

To: Land Shark who wrote (11593)	3/14/2007 12:18:50 AM
From: Id_Jit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37031

Immanuel, You present me with evidence that the balance of the scientific community does NOT support the idea that Global Warming is happening AND it is Man-Made… I’ve stated only my personal opinions. My only reference was the Tyrrell Museum link to backup my dinosaur ascertainment. If you want anti-GW links, then try here: junkscience.com Search for Global Warming, and don’t let your brain get fried by the search’s answers. Somehow I believe that the “Junk Science” link will be discredited extemporaneously. No. I’m NOT stating that I believe All the links on that site. I only visit that site occasionally. Good site none the less. NO! Global Warming is most likely happening for the present. Relative to when?.. AND is being caused by?.. AND the *NORMAL* is What? You did not answer as to what Alberta’s present Climate *Should Be*. Simply stated, you state that mankind is causing GW, and that GW is evil. AND??? The proof is in the pudding. Id P.S. You likely missed a prime opportunity to blow one of my “facts” out of the water. Yes! I knew it at the time that I posted it (long before actually) and left it in my post on purpose. That’s telling… IF… I’m correct in my presumption.