SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Suma who wrote (223935)3/13/2007 11:42:08 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
These do not lie.

One does need to be careful. There is a field of study known as Sampling Theory. To understand this consider what a sequence of pictures would look like on say Mt Fuji, spanning a decade, if the first pictures was taken in the winter, with each subsequent year having the picture timing delayed two weeks. Over a decade, the final picture would show Mt Fuji 20 weeks later compared to the first picture in relationship to the yearly cycle. This would result in an astonishing progression, but is actually just a sampling problem.

Most regrettably, pictures tend to be chosen to illustrate the issue, hence one needs to be especially careful with them. Even in scientific settings, I'm most skeptical of the pictures. Look at the data charts instead.



To: Suma who wrote (223935)3/13/2007 11:46:09 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I can't imagine humans are not having an impact, but it is also true the whole solar system is warming. We aren't responsible for the global warming on mars. That said, and what I've always said, we need to concentrate on averting disasters- it's so much cheaper to do that, than responding afterwards. We know there will be problems in low lying areas, let's protect them NOW, regardless of why the world is warming. It never hurts to shore up levees, and put in pumps, and do other things, as the Dutch have done, to protect land the sea could damage.

That's what I think. And if Gore stirs people up to do something, that's good.



To: Suma who wrote (223935)3/13/2007 11:57:19 AM
From: one_less  Respond to of 281500
 
I saw a fictional survival/adventure movie in 2004 called 'The Day After Tomorrow'. It was about a catastrophic climate shift caused by global warming. The satellyte view shows the United States under a pack of frozen ice by the end of the Movie. The final message was 'Now the healing can begin'. So we're suppose to believe that the rest of the world would be a pristine garden of peace and health if the USA could somehow be annihilated.

hmmmmm