Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (223964)	3/13/2007 3:00:52 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Which objective do you prefer to shoot for, that the unsuccessful neighbors take over the succesful state and take it "back to the bush", or that someone work on improving the neighbor's economic development so that they have better things to think about than killing the competition? In Zimbabwe, I would have liked it best if the 270K whites who called it home could have remained, in safety, and become accepted, as well as being great contributors to the country. However, I'm realistic enough to note that their landholdings most likely would have gone down, perhaps drastically. What interests me is trying to figure out ways to obtain the best overall solution for everyone. What I've observed in British africa, is that the regions where whites resisted longer, the race relations are poorer today. Oddly enough, ex-Rhodesian white farmers now are found in Botswana, Namibia,Zambia, and even places like Nigeria. Israelis of Ashkenazi descent are in the minority. You know what the ratio is? Also, how does the political structure reflect this?