SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (74663)3/13/2007 4:43:45 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
<<And the problem is no so much their cowardice as the fact that the pro-war AIPAC >. True, i tend to gravitate to the words cowardice and spineless, that being those not having the courage to stand up against AIPAC but , yes for sure, for sure, we have numerous Dems that vote the way they do because they are emphatically pro-war AIPAC by their very innate bias.
Hillary Clinton and John Edwards be two notables.
Obama, i think has been spineless. It seems he sold out his own views to become more acceptable to AIPAC, at least on cursory look.
But let's seek to count and list the Congresspersons Republican or Democrat or Independent that are taking an unwavering stand against the Bi-Partisan War Party.Max



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (74663)3/13/2007 6:50:33 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 89467
 
Dems cannot end the war. They just can't. They could shut down the Pentagon by denying funding, leaving 150,000 US troops stranded (which would put the GOP back in the WH in 2008) but so long as Bush-cheney are in power they have most of the authority they need.



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (74663)3/14/2007 2:24:04 AM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 89467
 
1237713 test--oops-delete (eom)