SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (35769)3/13/2007 9:46:28 PM
From: loantech  Respond to of 78430
 
Great post Mr. Aloha. It is good to have both you and Claude here on board as each of you has much deeper understanding than most of us here.



To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (35769)3/13/2007 11:53:34 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 78430
 
Well I did not compared MMG to ZNC at this point in time. Although they have similar ore types and will very likely end up with similar zinc quantities, I know MMG is much more advanced. I just implied that ZNC was also a great zinc play. Remember that ZNC has C$18M in the bank. Not bad for a market cap of $C52M. I think it will be enough for feasibility and I believe that very little additional dilution will be needed before production development. So I expect ZNC to move towards MMG market value in the next 12-18 months. When more money is needed, the stock price will likely be much higher therefore greatly diminishing production.

I was more comparing sizes of DNT and CUU, to MMG. For your info, DNT now has 8 billions pound of copper of which 78% is measured and indicated.

It is an error to believe that Peru is more risky than Mexico. It is not very much.

DNT will be the first to production before CUU and MMG. The reason is the nature of the deposit and the lower exploration and development costs.

The lead time to production is an important factor when trying to evaluate the value of a stock, that is probably why MMG is not higher prices. But I agree with you on the yet hidden value that MMG might have in its silver potential. They have published some exciting number. Will be very interesting to see how this thing develops.

I agree with your point on future stream of zinc mines vs copper mines. It should help zinc prices to come closer to copper prices.



To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (35769)3/14/2007 2:51:10 PM
From: semi_infinite   Respond to of 78430
 
<<<is in Mexico vs. the riskier Peru>>>

I believe the basis of that assumption needs to be revisited in view of the projected decline in PEMEX production. Where would Mexico's gov revenues come from if not from the natural resource sector?