SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (2203)3/14/2007 11:30:37 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25737
 
So the authors points about Hagel were valid - but should be dismissed because of his agenda?

So maybe Judith Millar should be accepted even though her story was bogus - but the author had the right agenda?



To: John Carragher who wrote (2203)3/14/2007 4:53:35 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Re: "what i am saying is the item is favored to hagel...."

Well, DUH!

It SAYS THAT RIGHT IN THE HEADLINE for chrimminy's sake!

"This was not an article written by msn rather someone with an agenda."

WRONG. It is not a news 'article' AT ALL, it's a COMMENTARY, an OPINION PIECE posted on a BLOG.

(Geeze... don't you even know the difference?)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News