SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (224111)3/14/2007 11:45:41 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 281500
 
lol

They did not forget....



To: Bill who wrote (224111)3/14/2007 11:48:06 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 281500
 
Here's a good piece on the issue....

opinionjournal.com



To: Bill who wrote (224111)3/14/2007 6:05:53 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Bush fired all of the US Attorneys when he took office. So did his dad. Now he is doing just what he did in the Emerald City, putting in party hacks w/o the normal congressional approval/oversight using provisions of the Patriot Act. Yup, the party hacks are necessary for the "War on Terrorism".

Keep drinking the kool-aid at your never ending lunch.



To: Bill who wrote (224111)3/22/2007 11:14:30 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
"The networks conveniently forget Clinton fired 92 of the 93 US Attorneys."

Clinton fired another 20 or more during his term after firing 92 attorneys which conveniently ended the Whitewater investigation in Little Rock. For some reason the newly appointed lacky didn't pursue the investigation even though the fired attorney was reportedly within a couple weeks of filing charges on Whitewater.

So firing all but one of the Attorneys General to avoid personal prosecution is not a political problem, but firing 8 for not prosecuting voter fraud is supposed to be a political problem. If that is not selective reporting, then I don't know what is.