SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Trading Cabana -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)3/14/2007 6:55:37 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 6370
 
Yes,... I'm not sure what it exactly is but it might be the time for some phone calls.

Lehman claims they won't run into the same problems of fall 1998 but the market doesn't buy it.

2 days ago when GS reported they bid it at 77 for a good half hour. It never saw that price again. Lehman went down on big volume on the day AHH imploded. Why? Why Lehman and not Bear which has - officially - a larger exposure.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)3/14/2007 7:09:38 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6370
 
Time to sell mortgage insurers. While I agree that the exposure is "limited" it at least acqnoledges that the risk is significant. Insurers will naturally hike insurance rates for mortgages. This means that costs go up, and less financing takes place, etc... the sentiment is not positive so everyone will be a little more risk averse after the shock.

UPDATE 1-Mortgage insurers say subprime exposure limited

Recasts with comments by mortgage insurers)

By Ed Leefeldt

NEW YORK, March 14 (Reuters) - The two largest U.S. mortgage insurers said they have limited exposure to borrowers with poor credit histories after their stocks took a plunge on Wednesday on concerns the subprime meltdown could claim more companies.

"Our inventory of loans in the subprime market that are delinquent has declined year over year," said Michael Zimmerman, vice president of investor relations at Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. (MTG.N: Quote, Profile , Research), the largest U.S. mortgage insurer.

Glen Corso, head of public policy at PMI Group (PMI.N: Quote, Profile , Research), the second-largest, said only 8 percent of its company's portfolio was at risk in the subprime market, down from 11 percent three years earlier.

Their shares fell after National City Corp. (NCC.N: Quote, Profile , Research), the No. 9 U.S. bank, said a large part of its second mortgage portfolio was covered by two mortgage insurers, whom it did not identify.

"The mortgage insurers are taking a beating, because a big subprime lender to the industry is saying, 'Don't worry, we have a high level of mortgage insurance,'" said Ed Groshans, an insurance analyst with Fox Pitt, Kelton. "The implication is that the losses these guys are taking will be passed through."

Shares in Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. closed down 1.5 percent at $56.65 after dropping to as low as $54.59 earlier. PMI was 1 percent lower at $42.29 after falling as low as $40.69.

CHICKENS AT HOME ROOSTING

In a regulatory filing, National City said a $2.2 billion portfolio of second mortgages was covered by two different carriers, one of which had been paying and the other of which had been "rejecting a meaningful number of claims." It said it may "pursue legal remedies against the carrier."

Radian Group (RDN.N: Quote, Profile , Research), the third-largest mortgage insurer, could not be reached for comment. Its shares fell 1.65 percent to $53.17.

Chris Winans, a spokesman for American International Group Inc. (AIG.N: Quote, Profile , Research), which also has a mortgage insurance arm, said "the issue referred to by National City does not involve us." AIG is the world's largest insurer.

Mortgage Guaranty Insurance and PMI both said mortgage insurers were initially hurt by a trend of securitizing subprime mortgages rather than insuring them. In a securitization, loans are bundled into bonds and sold in the capital markets, often to hedge funds and mutual funds.

If the loans fail, the lower tranches of the securitization are not paid interest and, in some cases, principal.

"The competition led to lower growth for the mortgage insurers, because securitizing was cheaper than insurance," said Zimmerman. "But now the chickens have come home to roost."

Fitch Ratings said, however, that guarantors of mortgage-backed securities also are likely to withstand problems in the subprime market, because their exposure is small relative to capital and earnings.

The U.S. mortgage meltdown, which began in February, has broadened as investors fear that subprime lenders, who make loans to people with poor credit histories, will run out of cash.

New Century Financial Corp. (NEWC.PK: Quote, Profile , Research), the largest independent subprime lender, has already been delisted from trading on the New York Stock Exchange and has received a grand jury subpoena in a federal criminal probe.

For more about the subprime mortgage crisis, see [ID:nN14246848]



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)3/14/2007 7:32:03 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 6370
 
Party Hangover?

Lehman Brothers on the hedge fund bandwagon
Posted Mar 13th 2007 3:40PM by Tom Taulli
Filed under: Morgan Stanley (MS)

Yesterday, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) made its fifth investment in a hedge fund (during a period of five months). With lucrative fees, such vehicles are hard to resist. Also, hedge funds can be a value-add offerings for high net-worth clients.

Well, today there was yet another deal in hedge fund land. And it's a big one: Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) has snagged 20% of D.E. Shaw & Co.

With $29 billion in assets, it's the fourth largest hedge fund in the world. Keep in mind that Lehman has less than $10 billion in alternative investments.

Something else to consider: Why is D.E. Shaw selling out? Might it think that there are some problems ahead? It's getting tougher to manage lots of capital?

It's impossible to tell. But, in light of the staggering valuation of Fortress Investments (NYSE: FIG) -- a hedge fund that recently went public -- D.E. Shaw probably got a good price for its equity.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)3/14/2007 7:33:49 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 6370
 
Earlier:

larouchepub.com



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)3/28/2007 4:16:38 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6370
 
LEH underperforms the other wirehouses. Still mute like a fish.

NDE what an odd spike. EOM time. It is not that easy if the share is not to borrow.
With options... this is tedious,



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1781)7/5/2008 8:47:29 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6370
 
How Lehman lost its way
The venerable Wall Street firm once looked like it would escape the worst of the credit crisis. Now there's talk of a Bear Stearns-like collapse - or a sale.

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- To understand what went wrong at Lehman Brothers, leave the canyons of Wall Street and head to the flatlands of Bakersfield, 120 miles northeast of Los Angeles.

That's where you'll find McAllister Ranch, envisioned as a 6,000-home, multibillion-dollar recreational community built around a Greg Norman-designed golf course, boating and fishing waters and a beach club. Now McAllister is three-square miles of fenced-off, almost lunar landscape punctuated by a half-finished clubhouse and a golf course gone to weeds.

So far Lehman's bets on McAllister and other real estate plays in Southern California's Inland Empire have cost Lehman at least $350 million.

None of Lehman's investment bank peers have this kind of exposure to the burst real estate bubble. Then there's the exposure all of them have: problems with collateralized loan obligations, leveraged buyouts, and mortgage-related securities. But Lehman insisted it was only minimally exposed to this kind of stuff.

Turns out, it wasn't. As a result, the bank and its shareholders have endured big losses; messy public demotions of the chief operating officer and chief financial officer; battles with short-sellers, who are betting that Lehman's share price, down about 70% on the year, will decline further; rumblings that the firm will be sold; and rumors (which we consider unfounded) that it will pull a financial El Foldo the way the late Bear Stearns did.

How has Lehman (LEH, Fortune 500) come to this? Read on, and we'll tell you Lehman's true history - and how management miscues, combined with historical forces outside Lehman's control, have put the firm in a world of hurt. We'll also tell you how we think the drama will play out.

Deals gone bad

....

money.cnn.com

Happy homeowners were supposed to have started moving in two years ago


McAllister Ranch looks like an almost-lunar landscape, with no construction going on.