Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (35901)	3/14/2007 10:10:38 PM
From: heinz44	Respond to of 78404

"And the reason I mention RNG so much is because nickel and RNG are on the move---why do you mention MMG so much?" Jaaaaaaa so I'm going to mention CDY....when all those exploration successes tie together watch out!! They already have 1m+ This WILL be 5 million ounces and more!! you heard it from me

To: koan who wrote (35901)	3/15/2007 2:05:00 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78404

Again you do not respond to the point, which is [check back] that you made a crack about telling Claude to go to the gold thread, when the title of this one begins with 'Gold' ... it does indeed say down in the header, 'and other mining stocks' ... note, 'stocks', note also that the words 'Posters must hammer on incessantly on some thinly traded warrant' do not appear You know, i spoke up for you a few days ago after you had nauseated Tom with this act, also last night with DAK, not likely to do that again, it just seems to encourage your overbearing arrogance, and does your logic no good whatsoever 'reason I mention RNG so much is because nickel and RNG are on the move' Actually you are quite specific on its thinly traded warrants, also repetitive, unto nauseam ... they're great, fine pick, tyke's pick from some time ago, they're absolutely wonderful, still it does wear a bit on us mere mortals after the first few hundred posts, plus there is the little detail that not all the money in the world will quite fit in that particular entry door, let alone the exit 'why do you mention MMG so much?' Actually i don't much, observe here how i make nine references this month [you make seven - so why do you mention mmg so much?] - siliconinvestor.com There was big news on it this week, they've got over five millions new cash in the kitty, and plans to use a good chunk of it on the Ag/Cu side, which you'd know to be a Very Good Idea if you knew anything about it, so that constitutes reason for comment in my opinion ... if you think it doesn't, who cares One of your seven [7] comments in re mmg was this - 'I can outdo that, I hold the record for buying MMG at the very high of the year. $5.37 I think-lol. I sold a couple of days later at $3.76 and was happy to be out' Message 23346092 Well, how is that for reasoning - you do some stupid trading and that makes a company bad? ... you bought into a heavy-duty NLW pump that had nothing to do with management, there is no reflection on them ... it happened right around the time silver tanked, well that's the luck of the draw, many stock charts show selloffs then ... no, a company does not become inherently evil just because you make a bad and/or unlucky trade in it ... not everything revolves around you, koan