SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (55936)3/14/2007 11:05:14 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 90947
 
SCHUMER'S FLEXIBLE 'FAITH'

NEW YORK POST
Editorial
March 14, 2007

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' admission that "mistakes were made" notwithstanding, all the Democratic rhetoric over the removal of eight U.S. attorneys adds up to rank hypocrisy.

News that the White House was involved in the decision to replace the U.S. attorneys - reportedly after complaints from GOP senators that they failed to probe voting fraud - may have "shaken" Sen. Chuck Schumer's "faith," as he put it yesterday, while looking stern for the cameras.

But that doesn't alter the fact that even Schumer, if pressed, would have to concede that U.S. Attorneys are political employees - and, as such, they serve strictly at the pleasure of the president.

And surely Schumer remembers when President Bill Clinton and his attorney general, Janet Reno, ordered all 93 prosecutors to resign in one fell swoop.

Democrats had no problem with that. Nor did any of them complain when it became clear that that decision had been made with White House input.

Indeed, suspicion quickly focused on the fact that among those dismissed was the U.S. attorney who had just advised Reno that he was within 30 days of making the "critical decision" of whether to indict a powerful key Clinton ally, Rep. Dan Rostenkowski of Illinois.

Speculation was widespread that firing the rest of the prosecutors was simply cover, that the White House wanted to buy time for Rostenkowski - who eventually served 15 months in prison - to help push the Clinton agenda through Congress.

Yet did Democrats threaten to hold high-drama hearings then?

No.

Schumer needs to give it a rest now.

nypost.com



To: ManyMoose who wrote (55936)3/15/2007 10:18:45 AM
From: mph  Respond to of 90947
 
They must not be against compuer pollution<g>