To: tejek who wrote (328949 ) 3/15/2007 12:52:33 PM From: TimF Respond to The history tells you why the current system is in place, but it doesn't negate the fact that the current system provides a lot of subsidies that for both financial and environmental reasons aren't a good idea any more, if they ever where a good idea. The first of the original contracts expired in 1989, more than one-third have already expired, and nearly all will be up for renewal by 2008. Contract renewal presents the best opportunity to modify water prices." Before you condemn the San Joaquin Vally for its water use, its important to note that the SJ Valley provides important export monies for the US that help in its balance of trade with other countries. Because of its mild climate, a number of vegetables and fruits generate two crops. Fruits and vegetables are shipped to South America during the CA summer when large portions of that southern continent are experiencing winter. Having said all that, water is precious in the West. It would not surprise me to see some serious fights over water break out between the states in the arid Southwest.
