SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (224300)3/15/2007 12:15:22 PM
From: SARMAN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
But you do not care about dead soldiers and their families. Unfortunately for you, you are the savage. Sending those fine American for cheap oil. How can you live with yourself.



To: jlallen who wrote (224300)3/15/2007 12:24:49 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
There are low-tech, inexpensive ways to better protect ourselves and our business interests against terrorists than engaging our military.

Going forward, we need a government that can correctly evaluate the size and the nature of terrorist forces and then COMPETENTLY execute a multi-pronged strategy to deal with it.

Maybe you don't realize that terrorism in some form has always plagued the US. Back in the 60's and 70's, remember how difficult it was for American business interests in South America??



To: jlallen who wrote (224300)3/15/2007 12:34:26 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
>>" In light of 9/11, USS Cole, Khobar Towers, WTC bombing, African Embassy bombings (2) and the stated plans of these savages to exact more mayhem, I'd have to disagree with your risk assessment. "<<

Oh golly, based on the above it is a darn good thing we invaded Iraq, the "center?" of these "savages?"....we needed to create more "savages". Good thinking.