SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (90233)3/16/2007 2:34:26 PM
From: Kevin Rose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Yes, that is the point.

Solar variability models fit fairly accurately, given the climate reconstruction issues, until that dramatic warming trend of the last twenty years. When you combine the solar variability and CO2/greenhouse gas models, you get an accurate model that closely tracks both the previous AND current temperature trends.

I've pointed this out to you numerous times, but you continue to ignore it. That laughing you hear? It's not WITH you...



To: longnshort who wrote (90233)3/16/2007 2:35:22 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
The models address the current warming period. Not the ones that happened Millions of Years ago. Conditions are different NOW as oppossed to during the Pleistocine era. The detractors love to point to data for millions of years ago, which is of a totally different timescale and degree of accuracy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News