SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10502)3/17/2007 10:19:14 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
Whoops; should have read the EB B4 that post...

World population may reach 9.2 billion by 2050
Biggest boom expected in developing countries, U.N. report says

Updated: 1:52 a.m. PT March 14, 2007
UNITED NATIONS - The world’s population will likely reach 9.2 billion in 2050, with virtually all new growth occurring in the developing world, a U.N. report said Tuesday.

According to the U.N. Population Division’s 2006 estimate, the world’s population will likely increase by 2.5 billion people over the next 43 years from the current 6.7 billion — a rise equivalent to the number of people in the world in 1950.

Hania Zlotnik, the division’s director, said an important change in the new population estimate is a decrease in expected deaths from AIDS because of the rising use of anti-retroviral drugs and a downward revision of the prevalence of the disease in some countries.

The new report estimates 32 million fewer deaths from AIDS during the 2005-2020 period in the 62 most affected countries, compared with the previous U.N. estimate in 2004.

This change contributed to the slightly higher world population estimate of 9.2 billion in 2050 than the 9.1 billion figure in the 2004 estimate, the report said.

The report also said most population growth will take place in less developed countries, whose numbers are projected to rise from 5.4 billion in 2007 to 7.9 billion in 2050. The populations of poor countries like Afghanistan, Burundi, Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Niger, East Timor and Uganda are projected to at least triple by mid-century.

By contrast, the total population of richer countries is expected to remain largely unchanged at 1.2 billion. The report said the figure would be lower without expected migration of people from poorer countries, averaging 2.3 million annually.

Boom in Africa
According to the report, 46 countries are expected to lose population by mid-century, including Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and most of the former Soviet republics.

Zlotnik said most countries in Asia and Latin America have reached the “relatively beneficial stage” of having more working-age adults than children or elderly in their populations, “and they will remain in that stage for at least two more decades.”

But their populations will then start to age, heading in the same direction as Europe and North America, she said.

“Europe is the only region at this moment where the number of people aged 60 and over has already surpassed the number of children,” she said. “We expect that Asia and Latin America will have by 2050 an age distribution that is very similar to the one that Europe has today.”

African countries will have an increase of working-age adults by 2050, but the continent’s overall population will also nearly double in that time, Zlotnik said.

“So it is the continent that is going to have to absorb a very high increase, and it will have to absorb it at levels of development that are the very lowest that we have in this world,” she said.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
msnbc.msn.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10502)3/18/2007 1:59:04 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
Wharfie, the papal decrees aren't worth the paper they are written on. Did you know that Italy is involved with Catholicism? Do you know where the Vatican is? Do you know what Italy's birth rate is?

There is a LOT going to happen between now and 2070 and 2100 and by then, the Greenhouse Effect won't be doing much according to the doomster predictions.

Your thinking is all government. The links you gave go on about UN population control theories. What matters is what women choose to do. They are choosing to not have children [other than in some high-breeding zones which can't afford many SUVs and 747 flights and have low energy consumption per person].

By 2100, I will be surprised if population hasn't dropped to 6 billion. I will be pleasantly surprised as it will probably mean I am still alive to observe the situation. In which case I'll be happy to see a 12 billion human population.

You should take government department graphs into the future with some skepticism.

Mqurice