Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ManyMoose who wrote (56041)	3/17/2007 5:11:18 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

There was no real Bushie investigation of 9-11. It was covered up. Bush was also against the 9-11 Commission and tried to stop it. The witch Ann Coulter smeared the brave 9-11 Widows for demanding the investigation. That was about 9 months later. Even then Bush-cheney refused to speak under oath or separately and stonewalled on many points. But we did get to hear Richard Clarke confirm that Bush-Cheney were warned prior to 9-11 and did absolutely nothing. Here's another question for you. Why did Bush claim he saw the first plane hit the WTC on TV? He said that the day after 9-11 and it's on tape. Why did he say that? The first plane was never on TV hitting the WTC. Bush lied. Why? And why did he just sit there for seven long minutes reading a chidrens book after our country was attacked? Something stinks with Bush-cheney and 9-11, which fuels conspiracy theories that they either let it happen intentionally or even had something to do with it. All I know is they were derelict and dishonest about the whole matter.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (56041)	3/17/2007 5:19:53 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Read the book "The Prize" and you will find out the real reason Bush-Cheney used 9-11 as a phony excuse to invade Iraq. It was all about breaking the oil deals Saddam had made and replacing them with new deals giving Exxon, Chevron and BP the lion's share of the second largest fields in the world, plus huge new contracts for Halliburton. It's all about replacing 10-90% splits with 70-30% splits payable to the host country by big oil. That means trillions of dollars. Only, the whole thing was carried out so incompetently, despite the bravery of our troops, that four years later Bushies still have not been able to steal nor revive the Iraqi fields as they planned. But they are trying. They want those oil deals before Bush leaves office. And what do US taxpayers get out of it? $3 gas, a trillion dollar debt to pay and 4000+ US dead and 25,000+ US wounded, plus our entire military and national reputation in tatters and creepy anti-Amrican Islamics much stronger than before, including a comeback for AL Qaida now that Bush dropped the ball on Afghanistan when we had them on the ropes.

To: ManyMoose who wrote (56041)	3/18/2007 4:11:43 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Between reading some of the spew that comes from A$, and seeing some of the SOROS and RAMSEY illiterates marching around today, then seeing that Dean was over visiting various countries WITHOUT permission, acting as if HE were the State Department....All good reasons to remind people of what baggage they will receive if they continue voting Dem. Just think....Joe Wilson wanted to be Secretary of State, had Kerry won..... Can you even think of anyone worse??????? Garfield would have been a better candidate than Kerry or Wilson.